BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Robertson v Margaret Dalmahoy. [1629] 1 Brn 172 (26 June 1629) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1629/Brn010172-0392.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION reported by SIR ROBERT SPOTISWOODE OF PENTLAND.
Subject_2 Such of the following Decision as are of a Date prior to about the year 1620, must have been taken by Spotiswoode from some of the more early Reporters. The Cases which immediately follow have no Date affixed to them by Spotiswoode.
Date: William Robertson
v.
Margaret Dalmahoy
26 June 1629 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
William Robertson, as assignee constituted by James Traquair, brother and heir to umquhile Robert Traquair, husband to Margaret Dalmahoy, pursued the said Margaret as intromissatrix with certain moveable heirship, libelled belonging to Robert, and in his possession the time of his decease. Alleged, She could not deliver the heirship libelled, because the defunct, whose heirship is craved, had two children that lived long after their father, whom she entertained all their lifetime, having no other means to do it upon but the said heirship. Replied, Not relevant against the pursuer, who is assignee by the heir; likeas the defender alleged no right proceeding from her bairns, who were never served heirs to their father; and, as for their entertainment, it should be imputed to her motherly piety; and she could not have retention of the heirship libelled, especially they being yet extant. The Lords sustained the exception.
Page 140.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting