BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Gie v Lord Yester. [1629] Mor 12379 (10 February 1629) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1629/Mor2912379-173.html Cite as: [1629] Mor 12379 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1629] Mor 12379
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. VII. Depositation being acknowledged, the terms how relevant to be proved.
Date: M'Gie
v.
Lord Yester
10 February 1629
Case No.No 173.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
If a writ be subscribed and not delivered to the party, but consigned in the hands of a third party till some cautioner subscribed the same, this writ cannot be thought to be the party's evident till the said condition be performed, and this condition anent the terms of the consignation may be proved by the depositar's oath.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting