BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Elisabeth Ramsay v Mackcoul. [1631] 1 Brn 187 (4 March 1631) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1631/Brn010187-0433.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION reported by SIR ROBERT SPOTISWOODE OF PENTLAND.
Subject_2 Such of the following Decision as are of a Date prior to about the year 1620, must have been taken by Spotiswoode from some of the more early Reporters. The Cases which immediately follow have no Date affixed to them by Spotiswoode.
Date: Elisabeth Ramsay
v.
Mackcoul
4 March 1631 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A Proposition not unfit to be Motioned in Parliament.
Whether or not decreets shall prescribe for sums of money within 40 years, as well as obligations, since the Act makes no mention of decreets; and, to clear both the old Acts for obligations, and the late Act of prescription of heritable rights 1617, whether the prescription be once interrupted, if the possession be continued forty years again after that, without any new interruption, the obligation or right shall prescribe or not? This was drawn in question betwixt Elisabeth Ramsay and Mackcoul.
Page 363.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
