BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Brown's Creditors v George Baillie his Executor Dative. [1631] 1 Brn 319 (20 January 1631) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1631/Brn010319-0843.html Cite as: [1631] 1 Brn 319 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1631] 1 Brn 319
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR GEORGE AUCHINLECK OF BALMANNO.
Date: William Brown's Creditors
v.
George Baillie his Executor Dative
20 January 1631 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action pursued by the creditors of umquhile William Brown, burgess of Edinburgh, against George Baillie his executor dative,—the Lords ordained the haill creditors to count and reckon with the executor, before two Lords appointed for that effect. Of which creditors some of them intented pursuit against the said executor, before the Commissaries of Edinburgh, and had obtained decreets. Thir creditors, in respect of their diligence, craved to be preferred to the other creditors; who, having intented their pursuit before the Lords, had not so far advanced in obtaining decreet. The Lords found, No preference should be granted for this diligence, in respect their process before the commissaries might be, by favour or moyen, sooner brought to an end than before the Lords.
In the same count, some of the creditors had no other probation to prove their debt but that the debt was inserted in the defender's own count-book, written by his own servant that wrote his counts, but not subscribed by the defunct. The Lords would not respect this kind of probation per se, without other adminicles, in prejudice of the other creditors who had bonds for their debts acclaimed. But, if the creditors will prove the delivery of the goods contained in the count-book, and give their oath that the same rest unpaid, the Lords sustain the debt.
Item, In the said count, the Lords admitted the creditors to whom the defunct was only cautioner, to come in with the rest, they making assignation to the rest of the creditors, to pursue the principal, that what may be obtained against the principal may be divided amongst them pro rata.
Item, In the said count, the relict of the defunct is preferred to all the rest of the creditors, in so far as she was provided by her contract of marriage allenarly.
Page 76.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
