BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Sheriff of Forrest v Town of Selkirk. [1632] Mor 6886 (5 July 1632)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1632/Mor1706886-004.html Cite as:
[1632] Mor 6886
A charter granted to a predecessor of small customs was found sufficient, tho' no special sasine was taken of these customs, there being a sasine of the lands contained in the charter.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a reduction of an infeftment of the small customs of Selkirk, granted by K. Ja. 5. thereof, to the Town, upon a reason of anteriority and prior right, made of the same by K. Ja. 4. to the pursuer's predecessors, to whom he was retoured heir; the defenders alleging, that the pursuer's predecessors' charter of their customs could not be a title to produce this action, because there was no special sasine of the same produced, granted conform to that charter; also that the pursuer's own sasine could not be a title to pursue, because it proceeded upon a retour out of the Chancellary, and was not given by the sheriff-clerk, conform to the act of parliament, and so was null. The Lords found, That the charter granted to the pursuer's predecessor, of the customs, was sufficient, albeit there was no special sasine taken of the customs, in respect there was sasine of the lands contained in that charter, taken conform thereto, produced, and that there needed no special sasine to have been produced of the customs, which was jus incorporeum, no more than there needed to be taken of the patronage of a kirk; and also the pursuer offered to prove, that conform to that charter, by the space of 20 years after the same, count was made in Exchequer of these customs, so that thereby the charter was corroborated with possession, and so needed no sasine; which was sustained, and the allegeance repelled: And as to the other, that the pursuer's sasine was alleged not to be given by the sheriff-clerk, the Lords sustained the process, upon the production of the pursuer's retour, and his predecessor's sasine, to whom he was retoured heir, albeit no sasine were produced, and so they respected not the defect of the sasine alleged; but the Lords inclined, if the sasine had been necessarily required to be used as a title, to find the same null summarily by way of exception, if it had not been qualified that the notary, giver of the sasine, was then sheriffclerk. ——See Patronage.
Act. Nicolson, Stuart, & Craig.Alt. Cunninghame & Mowat.Clerk, Gibson.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 469. Durie, p. 640.
