BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Kneilland v Duke of Lenox. [1632] Mor 15152 (1 November 1632) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1632/Mor3415152-030.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 SUSPENSION.
Subject_2 SECT. III. Whether Reasons of Suspension must be instantly verified?
Date: Kneilland
v.
Duke of Lenox
1 November 1632
Case No.No. 30.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In suspension where the suspender has intented reduction of the decreet, and the reasons of suspension and reduction were the same, the Lords sometimes would discuss the reasons at one time, sometimes would find the letters orderly proceeded, and suspend the execution for a certain space, while the suspender in the meantime might pursue his reduction; but finding thereby that the parties were delayed, the suspender insisting in the reduction, and thereupon craving a further time to discuss the reduction, they have resolved to find the letters orderly proceeded in the suspension, and to ordain the charger to find caution for such space as the Lords think meet for discussing of the reduction; that if the suspender prevail in the reduction, the charger shall refund the sum contained cum omni causa.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting