BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Stevinson v Certain Indwellers in Dumfermling. [1633] 1 Brn 194 (20 January 1633) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1633/Brn010194-0451.html Cite as: [1633] 1 Brn 194 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1633] 1 Brn 194
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION reported by SIR ROBERT SPOTISWOODE OF PENTLAND.
Subject_2 Such of the following Decision as are of a Date prior to about the year 1620, must have been taken by Spotiswoode from some of the more early Reporters. The Cases which immediately follow have no Date affixed to them by Spotiswoode.
Date: James Stevinson
v.
Certain Indwellers in Dumfermling
20 January 1633 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
It is a privilege of all free burghs within this kingdom, that the burgesses therein may arrest any man, found within the same, to answer, as law will, for any debt contracted by them, in trading and buying of wares and commodities from burgesses, but not for any debt constituted by bond and obligation. For this same cause, James Stevinson, citizen in St Andrew's, having arrested certain persons, indwellers in Dumfermling, and caused them find caution within St Andrew's, to answer, before the provost and bailies of that town, for the price of a pack of lint they had bought from him; afterwards convenes them before the said magistrates: from whom the defenders sought to have the cause advocated, because the provost, &c. foresaids, could not be judges to them, then dwelling within another jurisdiction; yet the Lords remitted it to be judged by them, as competent judges in the cause, in respect of the caution found.
Page 26.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting