BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> David Williamson v Auchmouty. [1635] 1 Brn 208 (27 November 1635) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1635/Brn010208-0481.html Cite as: [1635] 1 Brn 208 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1635] 1 Brn 208
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION reported by SIR ROBERT SPOTISWOODE OF PENTLAND.
Subject_2 Such of the following Decision as are of a Date prior to about the year 1620, must have been taken by Spotiswoode from some of the more early Reporters. The Cases which immediately follow have no Date affixed to them by Spotiswoode.
Date: David Williamson
v.
Auchmouty
27 November 1635 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
There was a decreet of removing obtained by Mr David Williamson, minister, against one Auchmouty, before the provost and bailies of Couper in Fife, for removing from a tenement within the said burgh. This decreet was suspended on this reason, That it was null, as given against the said Auchmouty, who was an indweller in St Johnston in the mean time, and therefore could never have been cited before the magistrates of Couper, within whose jurisdiction she did not dwell. Answered, That ought to be repelled; because the magistrates of Couper were judges competent, ratione rei sitæ, and might proceed against the suspender, though she dwelt not within their bounds; likeas, the charger, in supplement, procured the Lords' letters and warrant to summon the suspender before the magistrates of Couper for the same cause, which was sufficient
to supply all. Replied, The Lords' letters were ever granted periculo petentium; and, if the decreet were null of itself, the Lords letters' could not supply the nullity thereof. The Lords found the letters orderly proceeded, notwithstanding of this reason; for, in burghs, they use not to make any citation, but at the dwelling-house from which the party is craved to be removed; and it is customable also there to procure such suppletory letters of the Lords, to be a warrant to cite before them parties dwelling without their jurisdiction. Page 322.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting