BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Hector Acheson v Euphame Herring. [1636] Mor 12275 (5 February 1636) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1636/Mor2912275-026.html Cite as: [1636] Mor 12275 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1636] Mor 12275
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. II. What Proof relevant to support Defective Writs.
Date: Hector Acheson
v.
Euphame Herring
5 February 1636
Case No.No 26.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Umquhile Thomas Hamilton in Leith, and Euphame Herring his spouse, gave bond to Hector Acheson in the Pans, for payment to him of L. 120 for some ale that the said Hector had furnished to them. After Thomas's death, Hector pursues his relict to make payment conform to her bond. Alleged, The bond was null quoad qam, as being given by her stante matrimonio. Replied, He offered to prove, that she had promised to pay the same since her husband's decease. The defender contended, That her promise was only probable by writ or oath, the matter being of importance, above L. 100, and likewise tending to make a bond null in law effectual against her. The Lords notwithstanding found it probable prout de jure.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting