BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Janet and Katherine Ramsay v Elisabeth Wilkie. [1649] 1 Brn 414 (12 July 1649)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1649/Brn010414-1107.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1649] 1 Brn 414      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by ROBERT MACGILL, LORD FOORD.

Janet and Katherine Ramsay
v.
Elisabeth Wilkie

Date: 12 July 1649

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

There being infeftment of 80 merks, granted in anno 1624, by umquhile John Ramsay, trumpeter, out of four tenements in the Canongate, to umquhile Mr James Wilkie, in liferent, and Christian Wilkie, redeemable by payment of 1000 merks; sentence for poinding the ground was recovered in anno 1630; the which is suspended by the tenants, because they are tenants to Janet and Katharine Ramsays, daughters to the said John, who had right from umquhile Robert Ramsay, their uncle, who was infeft in an annualrent of 160 merks in anno 1623: upon the byruns whereof, they having comprised the whole tenements, and the legall being expired, the said Elisabeth Wilkie her poinding the ground, upon a posterior infeftment, must be excluded. Likeas, the said heritors compear with the tenants, and allege eighteen years possession, which is more nor enough in judicio possessorio. To the which it was answered by the charger, That the infeftment given to Robert Ramsay a year before, and his translation to the granter's daughters, together with the comprising following thereupon, cannot be more respected than a base infeftment given to a man and his children, which is null by the Act of Parliament. Likeas the charger offers him to prove, that the tenements are possessed by the mother by virtue of a liferent infeftment, who consented to the infeftment given to the charger. The which the Lords sustained.

Page 54.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1649/Brn010414-1107.html