BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Quintene Kennedie v James Browne. [1650] 1 Brn 466 (15 January 1650)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1650/Brn010466-1259.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1650] 1 Brn 466      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by ROBERT MACGILL, LORD FOORD.

Quintene Kennedie
v.
James Browne

Date: 15 January 1650

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Quintene Kennedie alleging to have been solicitated to come from Aberdeen over the water to Edinburgh, by James Browne, the time of the sickness, for making William Porter's testament; and having made the same, and moved the testator not only to make him his executor, failyieing his own daughter, but also, in case she survived, to leave him 10,000 merks of legacy: after sundry meetings with the said James, and refusals to deliver the testament, except he would give him the tenth part of his legacy procured by his moyen, at the least more than ten pieces, which he had offered to him; he, having delivered the testament, and gotten fifteen dollars in part of payment, as he alleges,—pursues the said James for the ten pieces, upon his promise before the commissaries, and refers to his oath; who depones with a quality, as is alleged; and is assoilyied. The said Quintene intents reduction, before the Lords of Session, within the year; as use is, and ought to be, of commissaries' decreets. Yet the Lords assoilyied the said James, and ordained £40 of expenses against the pursuer, being a member of the house. And the Earl of Cassells, being an extraordinary Lord of the Session for the time, would have had him refunding the fifteen dollars that he got, with fifteen farther.

Page 162.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1650/Brn010466-1259.html