BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Douglas v The Town of Jedburgh. [1661] Mor 10889 (18 July 1661)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1661/Mor2610889-145.html
Cite as: [1661] Mor 10889

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1661] Mor 10889      

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION III.

What Title requisite in the Positive Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. XI.

What Title requisite to the Prescription of annual Duties and Prestations?

Douglas
v.
The Town of Jedburgh

Date: 18 July 1661
Case No. No 145.

Forty years possession found to give right to a Sheriff to exact so much for the Sheriffsgloves.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Sir Archibald Douglas being heritable Sheriff of Roxburgh, pursues the Town of Jedburgh for the sum of L. 60 yearly for several years due for Sheriffgloves, and whereof he and his predecessors has been in possession past memory of man. It was alleged, There was nothing produced to make the defenders liable in payment of the Sheriff-gloves; and use of payment is not relevant to make liable, except the pursuer would condescend that he had right to the Sheriff-gloves.——The Lords repelled the defence, and sustained process for the Sheriff-gloves, the pursuer always proving his immemorial possession. See No 149. p. 10892.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 110. Newbyth, MS. p. 37.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1661/Mor2610889-145.html