BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Alison Kello v Paxton. [1662] Mor 6672 (3 July 1662) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1662/Mor1606672-085.html Cite as: [1662] Mor 6672 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1662] Mor 6672
Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. III. Certification, its Nature, Stile, and Effects.
Date: Alison Kello
v.
Paxton
3 July 1662
Case No.No 85.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a process betwixt these parties, an exception having been proponed, the Lords, before answer, ordained the proponer to produce the writs, with certification, that the defence should be held as not proponed. In termino, certification being craved, an incident was produced, because the writs were the proponders authors's writs and in their hands. It was answered, That the incident was not competent, there being no litiscontestation. It was answered, That it was most competent wherever there was a certification, as in acts in reduction and improbation.
“The Lords found the meaning of such acts and certifications to be only, that the parties should produce their own writs, they would make use of, and such of their authors’ writs as they had the time of the act, and that the other party might have their oath thereupon if they pleased, and therefore refused the incident.”
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting