BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Woodhead v Barbara Nairn. [1662] Mor 10281 (24 June 1662) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1662/Mor2410281-092.html Cite as: [1662] Mor 10281 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1662] Mor 10281
Subject_1 PERSONAL and REAL.
Subject_2 SECT. VII. Effect of Fraud - of Force and Fear - of Simulation of a Gift of Escheat - of Spuilzie - of Pactum contra Fidem - of Minority - of Reduction ex capite lecti - of Donatio inter Virum et Uxorem - of Payment to an Adjudger.
Date: Woodhead
v.
Barbara Nairn
24 June 1662
Case No.No 92.
Found in conformity to Cassie against Fleming, No 91. p. 10279. supra.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Woodhead pursues Barbara Nairn, for the mails and duties of certain lands. The pursuer alleged, Absolvitor; because the defender stands infeft in liferent of these lands. It was replied, The defender's husband disponed these lands to the pursuer with her consent, subscribing the disposition. It was duplied, The defender's subscription and consent was extorted, metus causa, whereupon she has action of reduction depending, and holds the production satisfied with the writs produced
and repeats her reason by way of duply, viz. If she was compelled by her husband, it was by just fear; because she offered to prove by witnesses, that he threatened her to consent, or else he should do her a mischief; and that he was a fierce man, and had many times beaten her, and shut her out of doors; and offered to prove by the notary and witnesses insert, that at the time of the subscription, she declared her unwillingness. The Lords found the defence and duply relevant.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting