BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Beg v Sir Thomas Nicolsone. [1663] 2 Brn 299 (25 January 1663) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Brn020299-0582.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER, LORD FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Thomas Beg
v.
Sir Thomas Nicolsone
25 January 1663 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Thomas Beg, pursuing Sir Thomas Nicolsone of Carnock to pay the sum of contained in his bond to Thomas Beg and Janet Levinston, in conjunct fee, and to the bairns to be gotten of the marriage, in fee; which failyieing, to Thomas and Margaret Begs, bairns of a former marriage; on which bond infeftment follows:
Alleged,—This sum cannot be paid to Thomas, because the fee of the sum failyieing of bairns of this marriage, did terminate in his other bairns nominatim, whereon infeftment followed; and there behoved to be a renunciation of the infeftment by Beg's bairns, before he could pay the sum tuto.
The Lords found the fee of the sum, failyieing of bairns of the marriage, belonged to the father; and that the bairns named in the bond could have no right to it, without they were served heirs of provision to their father; and found their father's discharge sufficient, without renunciation.
Act. Chalmers. Alt. Norvell.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting