BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Abercrombie v Thomas Ronald of Woodhill and Others. [1663] 2 Brn 304 (20 November 1663)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Brn020304-0591.html
Cite as: [1663] 2 Brn 304

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1663] 2 Brn 304      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER LORD FOUNTAINHALL.

Abercrombie
v.
Thomas Ronald of Woodhill and Others

Date: 20 November 1663

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Thomas Ronald of Woodhill, sets in tack and assedation, in anno 1657, for 3 or 5 years to come, at the tacksman's option, to Alexander Hewat, the equal half of the lands of Ladinghame's and Gavine's crofts of Blackhall, lying within the parish of Inverurie, and sheriffdom of Aberdein; for payment to be made to him of some 40 merks of tack duty, with some other small casualties. Ronald, in anno 1662, obtains decreet before the sheriff of Aberdein against Hewat, to make payment to him of the said tack-duty that these 2 years bygone was resting owing unpaid; and, thereupon, gets a precept to Ja. Panton, sheriff-officer, to poind, apprise, and distrenyie his (Hewat's) readiest goods and gear that he had on the crofts of Blackhall. Which the messenger coming to do, the said Hewat produced his master's discharge for the duty of the said lands, 1659, and all years preceding since his entry: and desired that the messenger would not poind his whole goods; but for that only which was truly resting, and was contained in the said decreet. Which, when the Master's depute was willing to do, Ronald ordained him to proceed in his poinding of the whole, notwithstanding the said discharge, and that he should warrant him; which he accordingly did: and so finding upon the ground of the said lands, 4 oxen, 4 kye, with 3 followers; a 2 year old steir, and a quoyack; he poinded the same, having admitted two burgesses of Inverurie, who, upon oath, apprised ilk ox to L.10, ilk cow to L.8, ilk one of their followers to 10 merks, the quoack and steir to L.8 the piece: offered them to any that would pay the sums contained in the decreet. Hewat takes instruments on all this. Then they carried them to the market cross of Aberdeen, and there apprised them to 194 merks money. Where compeared Hewat's son in name of his father, and protested against the apprising of the foresaid cattle; in respect it was in bear-seed time, and some of them were plough goods; item, because they had poinded more than they know would satisfy the debt; and, therefore, protested for spulyie, and all damage and interest that might follow: upon which he took instruments in a notary's hand. Hewat makes and constitutes Alexander Abercrombie of Fetterneir his assignee to the right he had to pursue the said action of spulyie, and to call for redelivery of the said goods; who immediately intents summons of spulyie, and violent profits against Ronald of Woodhill, Panton the officer, and others, their accomplices; warning and charging them to compear, &c. to hear themselves decerned to have done wrong in the said wrongous, violent, and masterful spoliation of the said cattle, being 13 piece in all, pertaining to his cedent; because in his possession, because on the ground of the lands possessed by him, because they stood and fed in his byres, laboured and tilled to his utility, at his pleasure, for certain space before the spoliation. Item, The beasts, their age, colour, horns, are all described; item, What each of them was worth; item, What profit Alexander Hewat, his cedent, might have made of the said beasts daily, if they had not been, in manner aforesaid, violently reft from him, and detained till now. And, therefore, he craves they may be decerned either to restore and re-deliver them to him in as good case as they were, the time of the spoliation; or else to pay the prices thereof libelled, together with the said daily profits libelled, which his cedent might have had. For instructing the which libel, the pursuer produced the assignation made to him by the said Hewat, of the said kye and oxen, &c. dated 1662; then the assedation and tacks granted in 1657 by Ronald to Hewat; then Ronald's discharge of 1659, and all terms preceding; then the transumpt of the executions of the poinding, under the said Panton's subscription manual; then his (Hewat's) instruments he took in [the] notary's hands, protesting against the illegality of their poinding.

Compear the defenders by their procurator; and for them he produces the instrument taken upon the apprising, and the offer made of the said cattle to the said Hewat, or any in his name that would accept the same, for the prices at the which they were apprised; item, A note of the executions of the poinding, bearing the persons' names (nine in number) that apprised, and their prices, &c. with letters of incident diligence against the said Panton, for making him exhibit the said principal executions. All which, the Lords having well considered, they assoilyie the defenders from spulyie as to the four kye and the quoyack, because they find them to have been orderly poinded: item, Decern them to have done wrong,—yea, to have committed spulyie in their pretended poinding of the four oxen, the three followers, and the steir; and, therefore, ordain them to re-deliver the same to this pursuer as assignee, or else to content and pay to him L.18, as the price of each of the said oxen and steir, modified by the Lords; item, L. 40 for violent or excrescent profits of the same: yet assoilyie from any violent profits of the three followers or steir, because they have none, &c.; and ordain letters of horning to pass upon the premises on fifteen days; because they found the alleged poinding thereof to be a direct spulyie. And this, notwithstanding, that, the time of litiscontestation, it was alleged by the defenders that they ought to be assoilyied from the said spulyie, because they poinded the foresaid goods alleged spulyied, by virtue of a lawful sentence for a debt truly resting: for this having been found relevant, and so admitted to their probation, and a day assigned to that effect; whereon their procurator protested for an incident, and the pursuer's procurators in the contrary; the day being come, he succumbed in his probation for them, and the Lords found the exception of lawful poinding proponed by the defenders, proven allenarly as to the five kye; and, therefore, as to the oxen, &c. gave furth their decreet, ut supra.

Act. Mr. George Nicolson, Mr. Alexander Seaton. Alt. Mr. David Thoirs. Signet MS. No. 6, folio 2.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Brn020304-0591.html