BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Blair v Anderson. [1663] Mor 3571 (18 February 1663) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Mor0903571-018.html Cite as: [1663] Mor 3571 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1663] Mor 3571
Subject_1 DISCUSSION.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Discussion of Heirs.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Where the Heir Male or of Entail is bound primarily; - or, bound to relieve the Heir of Line.
Date: William Blair
v.
Anderson
18 February 1663
Case No.No 18.
One having bound himself and his heirs-male, the heir male was found liable primo loco, and the heirs of line secundo loco.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
William Blair as assignee by the wife and bairns of Mr David Anderson, by his second marriage, pursues his daughters, both of the first and second marriage, as heirs of line, for implement of the second contract of marriage, and the daughters of the second marriage offering to renounce to be heirs of line, but prejudice of their provision, by contract of marriage, as bairns of that marriage, the assignee insisted against the daughters of the first marriage, as lawfully charged, &c. Who alleged no process, because the provision, by the contract of marriage insisted on, runs thus, that Mr David obliged himself, and his heirs-male, successors to him in his estate, but did oblige no other heirs. Ita est, there is an heir-male. The pursuer answered, albeit heirs-male were only expressed, other heirs were not excluded; especially, seeing he bound himself, so that the effect thereof would only be, that the heir-male should be liable primo leco.
The Lords found the heir-male liable primo loco, and the heirs of line secundo loco, and found the heir-male sufficiently discussed, by an apprising of the clause of the contract of marriage, in favours of the heirs-male, they not being infeft as yet, and having no other right.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting