BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Halyburton v Lord Roxburgh. [1663] Mor 16090 (25 June 1663) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Mor3716090-026.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 TITLE TO PURSUE.
Date: James Halyburton
v.
Lord Roxburgh
25 June 1663
Case No.No. 26.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
James Halyburton, as assignee constituted by his father, pursues the Earl of Roxburgh, for payment of a debt due to his father. The defender alleged no process, because the assignation was not intimated in the cedent's life, and so he was not denuded, but the sum remained in bonis defunctis, and behoved to be confirmed, especially, seeing this assignation is a general assignation, omnium bonorum, without condescending upon this or any other particular.
The Lords repelled the defence and found process.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting