BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mr John Colvill Advocate, v The Lord Balmerino. [1665] Mor 466 (6 July 1665)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor0200466-009.html
Cite as: [1665] Mor 466

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1665] Mor 466      

Subject_1 ANNAT.

Mr John Colvill Advocate,
v.
The Lord Balmerino

Date: 6 July 1665
Case No. No 9.

There being no wife or children, the annat belongs to the nearest in kin.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Mr John Colvill advocate, as executor to umquhile Mr John Colvill, minister at Kirknewton, pursues the Lord Balmerino and others, For payment to him, as executor foresaid, of the stipend due to the said umquhile Mr John, for certain years bygone, alleged resting owing, Mr John having died in February 1663.—It was excepted, No process for that year's stipend, because it was paid to the intrant minister, and was presented and admitted to the said kirk for the crop 1663; and the last incumbent having died before the term of payment, nothing could belong to the defunct, but what was in bonis defuncti.—It was replied, The executor pursued for the same, albeit the term was not come, as annat.—To which duplied, That the executor could not crave the annat, the same being truly due to wife and bairns; ita est the defunct Mr John Colvill had neither.——The Lords found, That the nearest of kin have right to the annat, albeit the defunct have neither wife nor bairns. And there being a question as to the glebe, the defunct having died in February, to whom the crop thereon should belong; the Lords found likewise, That the nearest of kin had right thereto, they always proving that the defunct had sown the same before his decease. (See No 5. the same case.)

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 36. Newbyth, MS. p. 32.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor0200466-009.html