BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Blacket v Bunkle. [1665] Mor 6542 (26 January 1665) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor1606542-008.html Cite as: [1665] Mor 6542 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1665] Mor 6542
Subject_1 IMPLIED OBLIGATION.
Date: Blacket
v.
Bunkle
26 January 1665
Case No.No 8.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
William Blacket, merchant in Newcastle, obtains a decreet against Helen Bunkle, relict of John Loran in Kelso, for payment of certain sums, as being the remainder of a great debt owing by her husband, whereof she entered in payment, and promised or constituted herself debitrix for the rest. The decreet is suspended, upon this reason, that it is without lawful probation, there being nothing produced to verify her to be debitrix; the most that can appear being only, that she paid a part, and desired his forbearance for the rest, which bindeth not the debt upon her unless she had promised payment.
The Lords found, that this was no valid ground to decern, and therefore suspended simpliciter.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting