BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir George Mouat v Dumbar of Hemprigs. [1665] Mor 9434 (22 February 1665) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor2309434-013.html Cite as: [1665] Mor 9434 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1665] Mor 9434
Subject_1 OBLIGATION.
Subject_2 SECT. III. Personal Obligation.
Date: Sir George Mouat
v.
Dumbar of Hemprigs
22 February 1665
Case No.No 13.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir George Mouat, as assignee to a tocher of 5000 merks, whereunto umquhile Dumbaith was contractor, pursues Hemprigs, as representing him, for payment. The clause of the contract bore, that the husband should have the tocher out of the first and readiest goods of the wife's father, and that he should have annualrent therefor, but did not expressly oblige Dumbaith to pay, and therefore he is not liable personally, unless he had intromitted with the defunct's means.
The Lords found the defender liable, seeing the clause being in re dotali, it behoved to be interpreted cum effectu, and if it did import only a consent, not to hinder the husband, it signified nothing; and because in cases conceived passive, where it does not appear who is obliged, the contractor is understood obliged.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting