BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Janet Kid v Dickson. [1666] Mor 16835 (29 June 1666) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Mor3816835-050.html Cite as: [1666] Mor 16835 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1666] Mor 16835
Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. II. Deeds signed by Notaries.
Date: Janet Kid
v.
Dickson
29 June 1666
Case No.No. 50.
Deed subscribed by one notary and two witnesses reducible.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Janet Kid pursues reduction of a disposition of some tenements in Forfar, made by her father on this ground, that the disposition is subscribed but by one notary and one witness, and the charter by one notary and two witnesses, and so is null by the act of Parliament, requiring two notaries and four witnesses in writs of importance. It was answered, That the tenements being small, the price of one expressed being 200 merks, and the other 300 merks, the foresaid two writs were sufficient, clad with many years possession in the defunct's time, who never challenged the same; 2dly, They are established by the sasine given propriis manibus, conform to the obligement of the disposition and charter by a town-clerk, registrated in the town-books.
The Lords having ordained the defenders to condescend, upon any adminicles they had, for astructing the verity of the subscription, they condescended only on seven years possession, which the Lords found was not sufficient to establish the right without reduction; but if the defender had condescended on 40 years possession, the Lords declared they would hear them dispute, whether that could be sufficient or not.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting