BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir George Preston v Sir John Scot. [1667] Mor 11397 (00 July 1667) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1667/Mor2711397-060.html Cite as: [1667] Mor 11397 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1667] Mor 11397
Subject_1 PRESUMPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION II. Payment when presumed.
Subject_3 SECT. II. Apocha trium annorum. - Taciturnity.
Sir George Preston
v.
Sir John Scot
1667 .July .
Case No.No 60.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir John Scot having pursued for payment of an annualrent of 500 merks out of Sir John Preston's lands, he alleged payment; thereupon litiscontestation being made, he produces three receipts, each L. 500, bearing to an account, and alleged that the odd 50 merks were for public burden; which completing three years, must assoilzie from bygones. It was answered, The dicharges bore to be granted by a factor, which was not probative, and that they wanted witnesses, and that, being given by a factor, they could not infer payment of all preceding. It was answered, That discharges of annualrents or rents are sufficient without witnesses.
The Lords found, That discharges to tenants were sufficient without witnesses, but not being granted by an annualrenter to an heritor; and found that the factor's discharge could not infer payment of bygones.
*** The reverse was found, 14th February 1612, Wedderburn against Nisbet, No 21. p. 6322. & No 7. p. 7181.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting