BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Murray v John Hume. [1667] Mor 15304 (2 January 1667) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1667/Mor3515304-184.html Cite as: [1667] Mor 15304 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1667] Mor 15304
Subject_1 TACK.
Subject_2 SECT. XI. In what Cases must the Tenant find Caution for the Rent?
Date: Earl of Murray
v.
John Hume
2 January 1667
Case No.No. 184.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Earl of Murray pursues Hume, his tenant, to find caution for his duties, or else to remove; who alleged, absolvitor, because the Earl was debtor to him in a sum exceeding all the bygone rents, and this action hath no place, but when there are some years rent resting. It was answered, That the defender was at the horn, and his escheat taken, and so was manifestly vergens ad inopiam.
The Lords would not sustain this member, unless bygones had been owing, but superseded to give answer till the compensation were proved.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting