BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Paton v Paton. [1668] Mor 9475 (21 July 1668)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1668/Mor2309475-026.html
Cite as: [1668] Mor 9475

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1668] Mor 9475      

Subject_1 PACTUM ILLICITUM.
Subject_2 SECT. VI.

Pactum contra Fidem Tabularum Nuptialium.

Paton
v.
Paton

Date: 21 July 1668
Case No. No 26.

In a son's contract of marriage, the father disponed to his son his estate, and was to receive the tocher, in satisfaction of the debts on the estate, and for provisions to his other children. A bond which his son privately granted to him before the marriage, was reduced at the wife's instance.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Paton, in his son's contract of marriage, dispones to him his estate, and the tocher was payable to the father. After the contract, and before the marriage, the father takes a bond of 2800 merks from his son. The wife and her brother pursue a reduction of this bond, as fraudulent, et contra bonos mores, et contra pacta dotalia. It was alleged for the father, That he might very lawfully take a bond from his son, for provision of his children after the contract, and before the marriage, having infeft his son in his whole estate, which was worth 1000 merks yearly, and getting but 2500 merks of tocher, and having some debt, and many children. It was answered, That the estate was not worth 600 merks of rent, and the father's liferent of 400 merks reserved; so that the annualrent of this bond would exhaust the remainder, and they would have nothing to live upon.

The Lords having considered the contract and allegeances, thought that it was not sufficient to annul the bond, that it was after the contract, and before the marriage, if there was any reasonable cause; therefore, and before answer, ordained the communers at the marriage to be examined, whether it was communed and agreed, that the tocher should be accepted for satisfaction of the debt and bairns portions; and they having deponed affirmative,

The Lords reduced the bond, as contrary to the communing at the contract of marriage, the estate being very mean.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 21. Stair, v. 1. p. 555.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1668/Mor2309475-026.html