BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Andrew Douglas, Macer, v Alexander Crawford. [1669] 1 Brn 585 (17 June 1669) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1669/Brn010585-1482.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR PETER WEDDERBURN, LORD GOSFORD.
Date: Andrew Douglas, Macer,
v.
Alexander Crawford
17 June 1669 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr Thomas Crawford having gotten an infeftment of an annualrent, effeiring to 3000 merks, out of a tenement belonging to John Douglas, the pursuer's father, and having given a back bond, bearing, that 900 merks belonged to Andrew Douglas, and that whensoever he should be paid of his 3000 merks, that he should pay the said 900 merks to the said Andrew: there was pursuit intented against Mr Thomas's son, at the instance of Andrew, for the bygone annualrents of the 900 merks, and for denuding of himself of a proportional part of the infeftment effeiring thereto.
It was alleged, That the back-bond could furnish no such action; bearing no such obligement, but only to make payment of the 900 merks, after payment of the whole 3000 merks.
The Lords, notwithstanding, did sustain the pursuit as to the bygone annualrents, in so far only as the defender had intromitted with the rents of the tenements; for which they ordained him to count and reckon: and did likewise decern him to denude himself of a proportional part of the right, in respect the back-bond did prove a clear trust as to that sum, and that Mr Thomas's name was only borrowed; whereupon, quocunque tempore, he might be pursued to denude; which being done, would liberate him from the obligement to make payment.
Page 52.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting