BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Gilbert M'Cleland v Lady Kirkcudbright. [1669] Mor 13302 (16 February 1669)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1669/Mor3113302-006.html
Cite as: [1669] Mor 13302

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1669] Mor 13302      

Subject_1 QUOD POTUIT NON FECIT.

Gilbert M'Cleland
v.
Lady Kirkcudbright

Date: 16 February 1669
Case No. No 6.

A conveyance, per ambages, may be effectual, where, if directly done, it would not be sustained.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The said Gilbert being infeft in an annualrent out of the lands provided to the Lady in conjunct fee before her infeftment, and long thereafter having got a new infeftment for the whole bygone annualrents accumulate in a principal sum; in competition betwixt them for preference, the Lords found that M'Cleland ought to be preferred for the whole annualrents yearly of the sum contained in his first infeftment; but as to the annualrent of these annualrents, as being, accumulated and made a principal sum, whereupon the new infeftment was granted, they found that the Lady ought to be preferred, in respect her liferent infeftment was prior thereto, so that it could not be drawn back in prejudice of her right;—notwithstanding, it was alleged, That if M'Cleland either had, or should yet comprise for the whole bygone annualrents, undoubtedly he would be preferred to the mails and duties for the whole sums contained in his infeftment; for the Lords found there was a difference betwixt voluntary rights and legal diligence, and the contract, to make the annualrent a principal to bear annualrent was odious, and posterior to the Lady's right.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 309. Gosford, MS. p. 43.

*** Stair's report of this case is No 44. p. 10648. voce Possessory Judgment.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1669/Mor3113302-006.html