BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Miller, Schoolmaster of Preston-Kirk, v The Tenants of Hailes and Treprain. [1670] 1 Brn 610 (18 February 1670) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1670/Brn010610-1532.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR PETER WEDDERBURN, LORD GOSFORD.
Date: Miller, Schoolmaster of Preston-Kirk,
v.
The Tenants of Hailes and Treprain
18 February 1670 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a pursuit, at the schoolmaster's instance, against the tenants of Hailes and Treprain, belonging to the Viscount of Kingstoun, for payment of 16 shillings Scots, imposed upon every husband land, to be paid to the schoolmasters, by a stent agreed to and subscribed by the whole heritors; to which action the Viscount, being likewise called by order of the Lords, who declared that he would not oppose the pursuit: It was alleged for the tenants, That they could not be decerned; because, the stent-roll being only subscribed by their master, it could not oblige them, they not being obliged by their tack to pay the same; and the imposition upon the husband land was not debitum fundi; neither was there any arrestment used. Likeas, some of the tenants were but lately come to the ground, and were pursued for many years preceding.
The Lords did sustain the defence; notwithstanding it was replied, That all the rest of the tenants of the parish made payment, and that, their master being cited in this process, they might justly retain so much of their tack-duty.
Page 106.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
