BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
The Duke of Buccleuch v Scots Others. [1670] 2 Brn 497 (20 July 1670)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1670/Brn020497-0834.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER, LORD FOUNTAINHALL.
The Duke of Buccleuch v. Scots Others
Date: 20 July 1670
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A glebe having been designed out of the Duke of Buccleuch his lands within the paroshin of Hassinden, to the minister at that kirk, the Duke he raises a summons against the rest of the heritors of the parish for relieving him of their proportions of the glebe, conform to the act of Parliament, Ja. VI. Parl. 14, act 199.
Against which it was Alleged, That though the summons was founded upon the act of Parliament, yet that it subsumed not in the express terms thereof, which bears that relief shall be only due of the other heritors where the haill paroshin, or a great part thereof, are kirk-lands; but so it is, it is neither subsumed, nor can be subsumed, that the haill paroshin of Hassinden, or a great part thereof, are kirk-lands; yea to the contrary, among all thir defenders called, there will not be ten acres of kirk-lands. To which it was answered, That the great reason of that act of Parliament being, that there was no more reason why the minister's glebe should be designed out of my kirk-lands than another's in the parish, therefore the law allows relief, yea, if there be not sufficient kirk-lands in the parish to complete to the minister four acres for a glebe, then it must be designed to him out of the nearest temporal lands of the parish, and the reason is the same whatever the kirk-lands in the parish be, many or few; and as for the act of Parliament, whatever the conception of it may be, yet a long contrary consuetude has derogated thereto.
The Lords found this derogation relevant.
2do, Alleged, By the acts of Parliament anent manses and glebes, viz. Ja. VI. Par. 3, Cap. 48; and Pari. 13, Cap. 161, it is appointed that ministers' glebes be first designed out of abbot's lands, then friar's, then vicar's, then any other kirk-lands; but so it is, it is offered to be proven there are abbot's and friar's lands in the parish, the possessors of which lands must be first liable in relief. Answered, Nullo modo relevat, unless he condescend upon these abbot lands, and who possesses them.
