BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Brodie of Lethem v Douglas of Muldarg. [1672] Mor 15793 (12 December 1672) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1672/Mor3615793-022.html Cite as: [1672] Mor 15793 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1672] Mor 15793
Subject_1 TENOR.
Date: Brodie of Lethem
v.
Douglas of Muldarg
12 December 1672
Case No.No. 22.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
To prove the tenor of a bond granted for the price of victual, which was alleged to be lost among the pursuer’s other writs when his house was burnt, the following adminicles being produced, 1mo, An instrument of requisition of the victual referring to the bond; 2do, Letters of horning upon the bond; 3tio, A suspension of the charge upon the horning; which the pursuer insisted were per se sufficient adminicles to found a decree of tenor, without necessity of further proof ;—it was objected, That the adminicles libelled might be sufficient to infer a relevancy of the libel, but by no means to be a full proof of the tenor; for this, among many other reasons, that a tenor cannot be proved, unless it be instructed who were the writer and witnesses. The Lords sustained the libel relevant upon these adminicles, but found they were not sufficient instruction of the tenor; and therefore admitted the same to be proved by the witnesses instrumentary, or others.
*** This case is No. 8. p. 2172. voce Charge To Enter Heir.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting