BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Smith v Waugh. [1673] Mor 491 (11 February 1673) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1673/Mor0200491-024.html Cite as: [1673] Mor 491 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1673] Mor 491
Subject_1 ANNUALRENT.
Subject_2 ANNUALRENT due ex mora.
Date: Smith
v.
Waugh
11 February 1673
Case No.No 24.
Denunciation makes the firm bear annualrent, though the horning be not registred.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a pursuit at the instance of Robert Smith against Mr John Waugh, referred to an auditor, this query was reported, whether annnalrent was due after denunciation, albeit the horning was not registrate, and so was alleged to be null by the act of Parliament.
The Lords found, That albeit the want of registration did annul the horning as to escheat, by the old act of Parliament; yet that it was not null as to inferring annualrent by the act of Parliament 1621, bearing expressly annualrent to be due from the date of the denounciation, without any mention of registration, and annualrent being very favourable after all diligence, which is due in most nations by delay or litiscontestation, and with us is not due but by paction, even not by sentence, but only by horning and denunciation, wherein the debtor hath no reason to object against the creditor's favour, in not registrating him at the horn, to make his escheat fall.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting