BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
A. v B. [1675] Mor 11086 (16 December 1675)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1675/Mor2611086-284.html Cite as:
[1675] Mor 11086
Triennial Prescription of Accounts, Act 1579. c. 83.
A v. B
Date: 16 December 1675 Case No. No 284.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords found, that a merchant being in use to furnish diverse years, that a current account did not prescribe; though some were of opinion, that the act of Parliament bearing no distinction, the acticles of account ought to prescribe from their respective dates; seeing otherwise the act of Parliament may be eluded, both in the case of counts and other cases which prescribe by the act.
Reporter, Nevoy.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 120. Dirleton, No 183. p. 155.
