BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Crawfurd v M'Carter. [1675] Mor 12458 (14 December 1675)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1675/Mor2912458-297.html
Cite as: [1675] Mor 12458

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1675] Mor 12458      

Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION II.

Single Witness, in what cases sustained.
Subject_3 SECT. I.

Cedent's oath, if good against the Assignee.

Crawfurd
v.
M'Carter

Date: 14 December 1675
Case No. No 297.

Found in conformity with Boyd against Story, supra.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Crawfurd, as assignee by George Hamilton to a bond of 800 merks granted by M'Carter, chargeth him thereupon. He suspends upon a reason of payment, and produceth several discharges, bearing receipts in part of a greater sum. The charger answered, That he offered him to prove, that there was another bond due to the cedent besides this, to which the receipts are ascribable, and produceth the extract of a bond of a greater sum anterior to this bond. It was replied, That the prior bond was cancelled, because, by inspection of the principal, it is evident that the name of one of the cautioners is torn from it, and the witness to his subscription, to hide which it is lately registrated; and it is offered to be proved by the oath of George Hamilton, to whom the prior bond was granted, that it was paid to him otherwise than by the receipts produced. It was duplied for the charger, That the oath of George Hamilton his cedent could not prove against him. It was triplied, That seeing the assignee founds upon another bond to which he is not assigned, whatsoever may take away that bond is competent against him by the creditor's oath.

Which the Lords found relevant.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 235. Stair, v. 2. p. 380.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1675/Mor2912458-297.html