BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Paterson v M'Kenzie. [1676] Mor 6760 (22 November 1676) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1676/Mor1606760-182.html Cite as: [1676] Mor 6760 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1676] Mor 6760
Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. IX. Abiding by.
Date: Paterson
v.
M'Kenzie
22 November 1676
Case No.No 182.
An assignee was suffered to abide by qualificate, but his immediate cedent was called and required to abide by simply.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The defender, in the improbation of an assignation transferred in his favours, being urged to abide by the same, and having offered to abide by the same as given to him for an onerous cause, and as true for any thing he knew, it was answered, That certification ought to be granted, unless the defender would abide by the same positively as a true deed; seeing otherwise, false writs might be conveyed through many hands, and the user of the same might escape impune, notwithstanding of the act of Parliament against the users of false writs, if they should be allowed to qualify their abiding by the same, in manner foresaid; which is contrary to the very notion of abiding by, which imports a positive asserting the truth of the same. Upon which debate, the Lords considered the great inconvenience on either hand, if a right may be taken to false writs and used impune; whereas, before any person take right to the same, they ought to inform themselves concerning the same, and the condition and quality of their cedents; and on the other part, if commerce should be obstructed so far as a right should not be taken without hazard to papers, having no intrinsic nullity or defect, that of falsehood being altogether extrinsic, and which cannot be known,
The Lords, in respect the cedent, who had made the translation of the writ quarrelled, was living, ordained him to abide by the same simply; and suffered the person, who has now right thereto, to abide at the same with the foresaid quality; but reserved to themselves, at the advising of the cause, to consider what the said qualification may import in behalf of the user. In præsentia.
Act. M'Kenzie & Others. Alt. Falconer. Clerk, Haystoun.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting