BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
The Viscount of Oxenfuird v Mr John Cockburne. [1677] 3 Brn 214 (20 December 1677)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1677/Brn030214-0273.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
The Viscount of Oxenfuird v. Mr John Cockburne
Date: 20 December 1677
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the pursuit, at the Viscount of Oxenfuird's instance, against Mr John Cockburne, he convenes him as he who was either as tutor, pro-tutor, factor, negotiator, governor, or who had the trust of his monies, in his minority, and while he was travelling abroad; that he may make count, reckoning, and payment to him for what monies were remitted to him by his friends, laying aside once what might handsomely maintain him. And he founded on the trust contained in the actiones excercitoriæ institoriæ; and in the edict, nautæ, caupones, &c.; and that young men be not not tempted to spend prodigally, which is the ratio senatus-consulti Macedoniani.
Alleged,—There was no title or jot in law on which he could be overtaken, he having only the trust of my Lord's person and breeding.
The Lords found Mr John Cockburne liable to count for all the bills remitted to his Lordship while abroad, and actually intromitted with by him; as also with what rents he lifted at home: reserving to themselves to consider, at the conclusion of the cause, how much his being governor should operate.
Some of the Lords were of opinion to have made him liable simpliciter; but the plurality qualified it, so as to render him only countable for his actual intromissions. However, the decision was in a new and extraordinary case; and it was not imaginable that, in their travels through France, Italy, Germany, and other places, Mr John, as my Lord's governor, either had kept an exact count-book, how he disbursed my Lord's money, or took any receipts of what he paid at Innes's, [Inns,] or other places.
