BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir William Hamilton of Preston v The Laird of Lamington. [1678] Mor 8949 (9 January 1678) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1678/Mor218949-062.html Cite as: [1678] Mor 8949 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1678] Mor 8949
Subject_1 MINOR.
Subject_2 SECT. III. What a Minor can do without Consent of Curators.
Date: Sir William Hamilton of Preston
v.
The Laird of Lamington
9 January 1678
Case No.No 62.
Found in conformity with Macadam against Lag, No 49. p. 8938.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Lamington suspends a bond on this reason, That it was granted by him, having creditors, without their consent.—Answered, He was not lesed, for it was for an onerous cause, a debt of his goodsir's, to whom he is now served heir.— Replied, He needs not say lesion, when the deed is ipso jure null; 2do, He was not then served heir, and so they had no ready execution.——The Lords found a minor, having creditors, might validly grant a bond without their consent, when he was not lesed; but assoilzied him from all annualrents of the land preceding his service; but the reason was, because the service here was not for many years after the grandfather's death.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting