BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Patrick Cockburn v Jane Blackburn and James Wood her Husband. [1679] 3 Brn 307 (12 November 1679) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1679/Brn030307-0385.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date: Patrick Cockburn
v.
Jane Blackburn and James Wood her Husband
12 November 1679 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Patrick Cockburn of Borthwick against Jane Blackburn and James Wood her spouse. The Lords simply annulled a decreet in absence, pronounced on the 31st day of July, because it was not a sentence done in the Inner-House, and the 31st of July is not a sitting day in the Outer-House. But if it had been pronounced before, and scored out for not paying the half-crown for the macer's dues, and then put up in the minute-book as dated the last day of the Session, this would suffer more debate.
In this case Newton likewise found, that Patrick Cockburn's retour, as heir to his father, was not a title in this declarator of the expiration of a back-tack in a wadset, but he behoved also to be infeft in the wadset lands, and to produce it; but found, though this objection was competent to the heirs of the granters of the wadset, yet it was jus tertii to the relict, though she had a liferent infeftment, because it was posterior to the wadset.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting