BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Somervel v Stayns. [1679] Mor 2197 (11 December 1679)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1679/Mor0602197-043.html Cite as:
[1679] Mor 2197
In a declarator of bastardy, a general citation at the market-cross of all parties having interest is sufficient, unless particular persons be named who would succeed, if the defunct were not proven bastard. These in that case must be cited cum processu.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
James Somervel having obtained a gift of bastardy of Janet Stayns, pursues a declarator thereof against William Stayns and Robert Handiside intromitters with the bastard's goods, libelling. That the defunct was repute bastard, during her life. The defender alleged no process, because the summons bears not the names of the father and mother of the alleged bastard. 2do, The lawful contradictor is not called, viz. That person who would be heir to the defunct, if she were not bastard. The pursuer answered, That he doth now condescend upon the father and mother; and that he had cited all parties having interest at the market-cross; and bastards have no agnates on the father's side; and their cognates on the mother's side cannot succeed.
The Lords sustained the declarator with the condescendence, and found that the general citation was sufficient, unless particular persons were named who would succeed, if the defunct were not proven bastard; and in case such were named, ordained the summons to be continued against these persons, and they cited thereupon.
