BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Jack v Town of Stirling. [1681] Mor 10912 (17 January 1681) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1681/Mor2610912-157.html Cite as: [1681] Mor 10912 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1681] Mor 10912
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION III. What Title requisite in the Positive Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. XII. Positive Prescription of other Rights.
Date: Jack
v.
Town of Stirling
17 January 1681
Case No.No 157.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Positive prescription cannot run without a title; and therefore not in face of the public laws, anent election and continuation of magistrates of royal burghs.
*** This case is No 3. p. 1838.; voce Burgh Royal.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting