BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Jack v Town of Stirling. [1681] Mor 10912 (17 January 1681)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1681/Mor2610912-157.html
Cite as: [1681] Mor 10912

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1681] Mor 10912      

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION III.

What Title requisite in the Positive Prescription.
Subject_3 SECT. XII.

Positive Prescription of other Rights.

Jack
v.
Town of Stirling

Date: 17 January 1681
Case No. No 157.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Positive prescription cannot run without a title; and therefore not in face of the public laws, anent election and continuation of magistrates of royal burghs.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 111.

*** This case is No 3. p. 1838.; voce Burgh Royal.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1681/Mor2610912-157.html