BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Elizabeth and - Barclay and Phin, their Mother, v Phin and Duncan. [1682] 3 Brn 434 (7 November 1682)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1682/Brn030434-0642.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date: 7 November 1682
Elizabeth and - Barclay and Phin, their Mother, v. Phin and Duncan
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a declarator of the commission of a back-tack in a wadset, for not paying the back-tack duty, by the space of three or four terms run together; it was Alleged, The back-tack not being conceived under an irritancy in case of not payment, by suffering two terms to run in the third unpaid, the failyie could not be declared.
The Lords, upon Forret's report, found such back-tacks had, in their own nature, a legal irritancy, though there was none in the contract and paction; and therefore declared it was incurred; and admitted the creditor to the natural possession of the wadset-lands, unless the debtor would purge the failyie by payment of the bygones before extract, and would find caution to pay it in time coming.
Though some cried out on this as extraordinary, yet the same was decided before; whereof Stair, tit. Tacks, p. 338, gives instances.
