BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Thomson v Anderson. [1682] Mor 9736 (16 December 1682)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1682/Mor2309736-080.html Cite as:
[1682] Mor 9736
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
An apparent heir being convened upon his passive title, that, by a letter to the defunct's debtor, he desired him to pay what he owed the defunct, to one of his, the defunct's creditors, and obliged himself to warrant the payment; because an apparent heir's uplifting heritable debts to pay the defunct's debt, is a behaviour; and any body's uplifting of moveable debts for such an end, is vitious intromission; and the appointing of a debtor to apply the payment such a way, is equivalent to the so uplifting and applying;
Answered for the defender; Intromission only with something in the defunct's possession at his death, doth infer a passive title, which cannot be charged upon the defender, who did not intromit with or give up the debtor's bond, or discharge the debt, but only interposed with him to satisfy such a creditor, by obliging himself to warrant secure the debtor; so that the money paid was not properly the defunct's, seeing the debtor's remained after the payment.
The Lords assoilzied from the passive title.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 32. Harcarse, (Heirs Gestio and Passive Titles.) No 38. p. 9.
