BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Earl of Southesk v Murray of Philiphaugh. [1686] 3 Brn 578 (21 January 1686) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1686/Brn030578-0876.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date:21 January 1686 The Earl of Southesk
v.
Murray of Philiphaugh
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Earl of Southesk pursuing an adjudication against Murray of Philiphaugh, the debtor offers to restrict him to a parcel of land; and the rental being admitted to probation, Southesk referred it to Philiphaugh's oath. Alleged,—He is not obliged to swear; because, when another creditor comes to adjudge, he may deduce another probation, viz. by the tenants and witnesses, and, if they should differ, it may reflect upon his oath. Answered,—This can infer no more hazard of perjury than if one creditor should refer the passive titles to a debtor's apparent heir's oath, and another should prove it aliunde.
The Lords, on Forret's report, found, if one were adjudging the whole, the debtor is not bound to depone, because there on the subject the other creditors would have interest; but where one adjudges only a part, there they found that it might be referred to his oath.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting