BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mean v M'Neil. [1686] Mor 372 (24 March 1686) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1686/Mor0100372-014.html Cite as: [1686] Mor 372 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1686] Mor 372
Subject_1 ADVOCATION.
Date: Mean
v.
M'Neil
24 March 1686
Case No.No 14.
A party who had been reponed against a decree, and allowed time to give in defences, having advocated; this found irregular, and the cause remitted.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Robert Mean, postmaster, gave in a bill against one M'Neil, bearing, that he was pursuing him, before the bailies of Edinburgh, for his house-mail; and, after he was decerned, he craved to be reponed; and the bailies having superseded extract for a time, that he might give in his defences, he, instead thereof, steals out an advocation, and produces it; which also contains an advocation of any removing Robert should pursue against him, though he was not yet warned.—The Lords found it irregular in both its parts, and therefore annulled the advocation as to the removing, and remitted the other action back to the bailies.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting