BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Captain George Ramsay v Lord Dalhousie and Tutors. [1688] Mor 16313 (28 July 1688)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1688/Mor3716313-231.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1688] Mor 16313      

Subject_1 TUTOR - CURATOR - PUPIL.

Captain George Ramsay
v.
Lord Dalhousie and Tutors

Date: 28 July 1688
Case No. No. 231.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Mr. John Ramsay, third brother to my Lord Dalhousie, having, in absence of his second brother, served himself tutor of law to my Lord's children, upon the tutors testamentary lying off and neglected to accept, for whom Sir John Ramsay, one of the tutors testamentary, became cautioner, and was by him appointed factor, and acted as such several years;

The testator's second brother, after his return from abroad, took out brieves to serve himself tutor of law; of which service a bill of advocation was presented, upon these reasons; 1st, There is already a tutor of law served and retoured, whose service ought first to be reduced; 2do, A quorum of the tutors testamentary had accepted, which excludes any tutor of law.

Answered: The first service of tutory was null ex evidentia rei, it being notour that John was but the third brother; 2do, The tutors testamentary had lain off for several years, and suffered a tutor of law to serve; and Sir John Ramsay, one of the testamentaries accepting, had renounced the office, by becoming cautioner for the pretended tutor of law.

The Lords repelled the first reasons of advocation, but sustained the second; and found, that the tutors testamentary accepting before the brieves of tutor of law were served, though not within a year of the defunct's death, when they might have accepted, did exclude the service, and that Sir John might yet accept as tutor testamentary.

Harcarse, No. 1001. p. 282.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1688/Mor3716313-231.html