BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir James Douglas of Kilhead v Andrew Martin. [1692] 4 Brn 3 (17 November 1692) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1692/Brn040003-0007.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Sir James Douglas of Kilhead
v.
Andrew Martin
17 November 1692 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir James Douglas of Kilhead, having charged Captain Andrew Martin, merchant in Edinburgh, to fulfil a minute, whereby he was to pay L.40,000 Scots for the lands of Pilrig; and he suspending, that the minute was imprestable for want of a sufficient progress and security of the lands, and so null. The question arose, if the bill of suspension should pass without caution, seeing the charger refused to dismiss it summarily, desiring rather to let it pass, he getting caution for the price of the land; and the other contending, the term of his payment was not till Whitsunday next, and so he could not be obliged to find caution before the term for so great a sum.
The Lords took a middle course, and ordained him to find caution for what was instantly prestable by him, viz. for extending the disposition; and for his entering to the possession of the lands, they ordained the present factor to continue and to be comptable to any who shall be found to have right to the rents in the event of discussing; but they thought the debate running on the nullity of the minute, it was both their interests to have it summarily determined.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting