BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Rankeillar and Michael Geddy v The Magistrates of St. Andrews. [1693] 4 Brn 64 (8 February 1693)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1693/Brn040064-0154.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1693] 4 Brn 64      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.

Thomas Rankeillar and Michael Geddy
v.
The Magistrates of St Andrews.

Date: 8 February 1693

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Thomas Rankeillar and Michael Geddy, skippers in St. Andrews, against the Magistrates thereof. The Lords found the pursuers had sufficient interest to lift the money; but considered first if there was any necessary cause for calling for it at this time; and therefore ordained them to condescend why they did not think it sufficiently secured in the town of St. Andrews hands; and if they should uplift it, then ordained them to re-employ it again, and not to break the stock; but decerned them to get the bygone annualrents.

It was Pled in this cause,—That a society and incorporation could not subsist in fewer than three, and that here there were only two skippers; and so the corporation of the seamen of that town being dissolved, this sum either fell as caduciary to the fisk, or returned to the city within which the decayed incorporation had acquired that fund.

But the Lords did not regard this subtility, for the rest of the seamen there concurred with thir pursuers.

Vol. I. page 556.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1693/Brn040064-0154.html