BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Morison of Darsie's Creditors v Sir John Dempster, &c. [1695] 4 Brn 270 (20 February 1695) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1695/Brn040270-0605.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Morison of Darsie's Creditors
v.
Sir John Dempster, &c
20 February 1695 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
[See the prior part of the Report of this Case, Dictionary, page 3804.]
Rankeiler reported Sir Alexander Bruce of Broomhall, and other Creditors of Morison of Darsie, against Sir John Dempster of Pitlever, and Patrick Stiell, mentioned 14th February 1694, anent the reduction of a decreet of count and reckoning obtained by Mr Hary Blyth, whereto Pitlever has now right.
The Lords found it no nullity that Darsie produced sundry rights that were not called for, which were found, on counting, to be paid by intromission within the legal; and that it was not sufficient to infer collusion; but found it was not res judicata quoad such creditors who were not called, and were either in possession at the time of the raising his summons, or stood publicly infeft; for such he ought not to have miskenned. But as to those who compeared, though not ab initio, it was a decreet in foro against them; and, quoad Douglass of Stonypath's wadset of £20,000, and other rights that were not then deducta in judicium, that they might be yet produced and founded on.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting