BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Canon v Canon. [1695] Mor 2070 (23 December 1695)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1695/Mor0502070-002.html Cite as:
[1695] Mor 2070
The acceptor of a disposition omnium bonorum, with the burden of all the granter's debts, but under the proviso, that the debts do not exceed the value of the estate, found not obliged to find cautionem mutiam.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Canon of Barley pursuing Canon of Headmark, to pay a sum due to him by his predecessor, as he who accepted a disposition with the burden of his debts; and the disposition being produced, at advising of the cause, he alleged that it bore this quality, providing the debts due do not exceed the value of the estate, which cannot be cognosced till all the creditors were cited, and their debts compared with the heritage; at least, if he be decerned to pay this pursuer, as he who had done most diligence, (laws not being made for the negligent) he ought to find him cautio mutiana to refund proportionally, if more debt emerged than the heritage can pay.——The Lords found this desire unreasonable, and refused his bill; for then he who shall now enter heir cum beneficio inventarii, conform to the late statute 1695, may refuse payment till all the creditors be discussed, and an executor might propone the same exception; whereas all the remedy by law provided was, if a less preferable creditor got first payment, no action lay at the other creditor's instance against the executor, if the inventory was exhausted by prior sentences; but they were left to their action of repetition from these other creditors, l. ult. C. de jure delib.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 123. Fountainhall, v. 1. p. 680.
