BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Fisher and the Administrators of Heriot's Hospital v Hepburn. [1695] Mor 11149 (19 December 1695) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1695/Mor2611149-349.html Cite as: [1695] Mor 11149 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1695] Mor 11149
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION XII. Who Privileged against Prescription?
Date: Thomas Fisher and the Administrators of Heriot's Hospital
v.
Hepburn
19 December 1695
Case No.No 349.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords having found, upon the 29th December 1691*, that Heriot's Hospital, being founded for orphans and minors, prescription could not run against them, they now reponed the other party against this interlocutor, there being as yet no definitive sentence in the cause to make a res judicata; and found, that the minority, sufficient to elide prescription, was only that species of minority, that runs out and terminates at the age of 21, which is not the case of Heriot's Hospital (nor indeed of any orphanotrophium) which never expires, the boys being always turned out at their age of 16, whereby it is a succession of of perpetual minors; and found this Hospital not within the exception of the act of Parliament 1617, touching prescription, which is stricti juris, and not to be extended, especially ad casus insolitos et incogitatos.
*** This case is No 82. p. 10786.
* See Stair, B. 2. Tit. 12. § 18.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting