BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Purves v Miller and Crawford. [1696] 4 Brn 321 (18 June 1696) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1696/Brn040321-0689.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Purves
v.
Miller and Crawford
18 June 1696 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mersington reported Purves against Miller and Crawford, feuars in Dunse, being a suspension of a decreet of the baron-court of Dunse fining them in *£100 for the riotous throwing down of a dyke Purves had built on his own ground. Answered,—The decreet was null, being pronounced in vacance without a dispensation, and the fine beyond the baron-bailie's jurisdiction; and, as to the fact, it was warrantable, seeing thereby you closed up a door which, past memory of man, was a common passage to the crofts adjoining; replied,—While, the whole tenement of houses was in one heritor's hand it was then a passage; but coming now, by a contract of division, to be possessed by two, this door falls all to be within. Purves's share and proportion. Replied,—Though it were, it must be always with the burden of a servitude of passage to me for the conveniency of my land.
The Lords assoilyied from the fine, in respect the point of right was yet dubious; but turned the decreet to a libel, and allowed the Ordinary to hear them, who had hest right to this door, or if it was common to them both.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting